Thulean Archives

Guardians of Scandinavia. I had a little discussion on their channel yesterday about the possibility for a National Socialist Scandinavia, like a United Scandinavia, and they argue that it is possible and I think it is not possible. I'm just gonna quickly sum up why it's not possible. There is no chance in hell^[1] that a National Socialist political party will ever win ground in Scandinavia.^[2] It won't be allowed.^[3] They argue that we have enough food in Scandinavia and also enough oil and that^[4] if Scandinavia had just quickly got nuclear weapons, nobody would mess with^[5] them, just like nobody is messing with North Korea. But I'm gonna address these^[6] points, each one of them. First of all, North Korea has rare earth, a lot of it. Probably the biggest reserves in the world. Rare earth is needed for just^[7] about everything we produce today. It's even needed for oil refining. And North Korea is already a puppet state of China, so that's why they are allowed to exist^[8] for now. And of course they have nuclear weapons, which of course, yes, is an argument as well. In relation to Norway and oil, yes, on paper Norway has oil, but the moment Norway is not a puppet regime of the USA, Norway no longer has oil, because all the oil is in the North Sea. And I happen to know that the pipelines from these oil rigs, they're not even going to Scandinavia. A few of them are, yes. But the vast majority of the pipelines are going directly to Great Britain or Holland. So anybody who wants to can just take them and say, well, now they're ours. And Norway, what are they gonna do about it? The oil pipelines are^[9] already going to Great Britain and the Netherlands. And if you inserted a National Socialist government in Norway or in Scandinavia, then of course USA would have just seen that as, yes, a great opportunity for us to just grab that oil for ourselves. And they would have. And you would not have been able to do anything about it. So oil, we have it as long as we are puppets of the USA. That's it. Food production. Yes, you claim that Denmark alone has food enough to feed 30 million people or something. I don't believe in that. Maybe you're right though.^[10] But what you have to take into consideration is that this food is^[11] produced using modern machinery produced in the USA. The food is^[12] produced using oil. And I just explained how Scandinavia won't have any oil if^[13] they're not US puppets. So the moment you insert a non-US puppet regime in Scandinavia, then you have no oil and you have no food. And if you^[14] think you can produce food like North Korea does, to a large extent without the use of oil, and that's why they're starving, in Scandinavia then think^[15] again. In order to change the system, I can use my own garden as an example. We are using permaculture to grow our own food, but we have done^[16] it for a couple of years and we are no way near our goal to actually feed ourselves. Because this takes time. At least five, maybe ten years before you^[17] can turn your own property into an environmentally friendly place of^[18] food production. Environmentalism and modern agriculture crash a hundred percent. And you need a modern agriculture to produce, if what you say is correct, food for 30 million people. Without modern agriculture you can't do that. And you can assume that the same land can produce maybe five percent of the food that modern agriculture can produce. And they are able to do that because of oil. And then to your point about nuclear weapons. You say that if Scandinavia has nuclear weapons, nobody will attack them. Which is fine on paper, but Scandinavia doesn't have nuclear weapons. In other words, you would have to do something to get nuclear weapons. And how long do you think that would take? And when the USA found out that you are trying to get nuclear weapons, what do you think would have happened?^[19][20] Scandinavia would have been reduced to rubble, all the oil platforms would have been, you know, confiscated. And bye-bye Scandinavia. So no, if national socialism should achieve a victory in Scandinavia, then the people would have been starved. After a couple of weeks the whole whole Scandinavia would have been starving. There would be no oil and most likely it would have been bombed back to the Stone Age, or the oil would have been taken by the USA, and so forth. So that's a pretty bad idea. I can add another point, namely, who is going to gain support from Scandinavians for national socialism? Hitler didn't. I can't^[21] think of anybody in Scandinavia who would. And if you, you know, did gain some popularity in Scandinavia, then you would have had to deal with all the others as well, because most Scandinavians could be defined as Marxists. So are you going to have a civil war? Are you going to put 30, 40, 50 percent of the Scandinavian^[22] population in concentration camps? Or are you going to let them, you know, organize armed rebellions against your regime? Because they would. There's no chance, and you could bet that the USA would have given them all the weapons they could dream of. So this is a terrible, terrible solution, you know. And even in Sweden you have^[23] like one, one out of eight individuals in Sweden is already an immigrant not from Europe. And they are not going to vote for your parties. And my possibly most important point here is that you wish to keep civilization, but civilization is the problem.^[24] You think we would have had all this non-European immigration to Europe if we didn't have civilization, if we didn't have the National Socialists created welfare system, for example. And this welfare system created by the National Socialists is dumbing us down in itself. That alone is turning our own populations into a dumber and dumber population, or dumber and dumber populations. One more point in relation to agriculture in Denmark. Modern agriculture is turning Denmark into a desert and washing off all the fertile soil from Denmark into the sea. And you claim that National Socialism is^[25] environmental, or is about environmentalism as well. Well, that crashes completely. You can't have modern agriculture and environmentalism at the same time. That's a complete crash. And with that said, even a National Socialist system would be destructive, both in terms of environmental damage, but also in relation to the population itself. Because it's civilization, it's auto-domestication, it's breaking down the individual human being, just like any other civilization. You could argue that it does it less than the others, but, you know, still does it. Civilization itself is the problem. That's what attracts all the immigrants, that's what's breaking us down, that's what's turning us into Untermenschen, basically, civilization. When the problem is this civilization, then we shouldn't do anything to uphold this civilization. And thankfully, this civilization is completely dependent on rare metals and on oil, and we are running out. Some argue that oil is abiotic and stuff^[26] like that, and even if it is, we're still running out of rare metals. So, this civilization is going to stop and fall. And the vast majority of people are^[27] going to die, because we need that oil to feed people. It's a matter of time, maybe 50 years, maybe a hundred, maybe ten, but it's probably going to happen long before you gain any popular support for National Socialism in Scandinavia. Finally, in relation to your claim in regards to tribalism, that tribalism failed, it didn't fail to protect Germania against the Romans, that's one thing. And I can remind you of the fact that our entire civilization is so deep in shit, because most people are not tribal, except one little group.^[28] And this group is so successful because it is tribal, not because of their intelligence, not because they're very skillful, because they work in a tribal way, like we all did before, like we all should. And if we had kept being tribal,^[29] we wouldn't have this problem to begin with, because that would have ensured that that other tribe would not have been able to benefit from tribalism anymore than we would. Thanks for watching, bye bye. Stop wasting your time, energy, hope and lives on National Socialism. Prepare for impact instead: The Monster will fall, and fall HARD.^[30]

---

1. Germany already tried that, by the way. How did that go?
2. Almost all the mass media in Scandinavia is owned by US media corporations.
3. So yes, this while discussion is rather silly. It will never happen. But let us engage in it anyhow, as a though experiment.
4. About 61% of Denmark is agricultural area.
5. Less than 9% of Sweden is agricultural area.
6. Less than 3% of Norway is agricultural area.
7. You can not refine rear earth unless you are willing to turn your country into a radioactive wasteland. That's why we have no rear earth production in Europe or the USA.
8. China controls 98% of the rare earth production, and thus China alone could COMPLETELY STOP ALL YOUR INDUSTRY just like that, if she wanted to.
9. Military budget of GDP. Norway 1.6%, Denmark 1.1%, Sweden 1%, Russia 5.4%, USA 3.3%.
10. Scandinavia seems to import a lot of food though.
11. Norway has to import 60% of the food need to feed the population. But yes, some of it from Denmark.
12. Good luck getting spare parts for your tractors as a National Socialist Scandinavia.
13. Volvo can't make any new tractors without rare metals from COMMUNIST China.
14. Well. You have some food. But not nearly enough for even half the population.
15. Their efficiency in agriculture is terrible, because they have so little oil to spend on that.
16. You need no oil for permaculture, but at the same time you get much less food from it. It's sustainable though.
17. What will Scandinavians eat in those 5-10 years?
18. SUSTAINABLE!
19. So when i said there was weapons of mass-destruction I meant oil.
20. "The threat from Saddam Hussein and weapons of mass destruction - chemical, biological, potentially nuclear weapons capability - that threat is real." Tony Blair.
21. The NS party in Norway had almost no support in Norway in the 30ies.
22. A civil war where NOBODY supports the National Socialists, and EVERYBODY supports their enemies. Who do you think will win?
23. Like they did with the MUSLIMS in the former Yugoslavia, to force Serbia to kneel, so to speak. And when that didn't work, they bombed Serbia into submission in 1999.
24. A civilization that came from this part of the world.
25. See my video about Earth erosion.
26. We are running out GLOBALLY. Yes. Civilization will fall GLOBALLY.
27. China is probably the first to fall, but ALL WILL FALL. So no: Europe is not going to be "barbarian" and "uncivilized" alone.
28. And one very large group in East Asia. Speaking Mandarin, yes.
29. Christianity destroyed OUR tribalism INTENTIONALLY.
30. Live a simpler life, with Traditional Tribalism. Stop feeding the monster.