Video version of this article
0:08:40
#Varg #Paganism #AncientEgypt #AncestralCult #Gods
The Gods live amongst us
There are many opinions regarding our pre-Christian European heritage, But is there a right and wrong here? Let's find out.
I believe there's one extremely important thing to consider when we look at not just the sources describing our pre Christian heritage, but also when we look at the people who interpreted these sources. First of all, I'm going to use the Santa Claus example again. As you know, we still have this charade for the children. Where we pretend that there is a Santa Claus that descends through the chimney, and he delivers gifts to the kind children. Those who weren't kind, they get some ashes instead. And this is something we want the children to believe. Therefore, we ask our children not to watch videos like this, for example. And then at the later stage, we either tell the children the truth, or they find out by themselves. And the reason why this picture is important is because if you are not part of this tradition and you come from the outside... I'm surrounded by children, and someone asks me, "what's the purpose of this Santa Claus dude?". Then I will not tell him that this is a charade.[1]I'm going to tell him exactly what I tell the children. And this is also exactly what the written sources, even those from classical antiquity, tell us about our pre-Christian heritage. It tells us what we are supposed to know if we are not "initiated", so to speak. Like adults are initiated into the secrets of Santa Claus.
And I may stress that if you are an outsider, and then, of course, you are going to see only the exoteric version of the religion. And if you write something down, you're only going to write down the exoteric version of the religion or tradition. You're not going to put esoteric secrets in there, because some people can read it, and then the purpose is lost.[2]So whenever someone comes from the outside, interview somebody, or talks to somebody about it, they're going to get the exoteric version. And this is one of the reasons why it's very difficult for us to understand what the esoteric version of our own heritage was really all about.
If you go to archaeology, where you find remains, where you find remains of temples and such, and before the advent of science, educated people, universities and so forth, the people who took the responsibility, if you want to put it that way, in interpreting all of this, were the priests. So, for example, the first remains of our forebears, the Neanderthals, when the priests were shown these remains, they[3]got delivered a version that was very, very at odds with what is actually true. So therefore, you have this presentation of the Neanderthals as some sort of "beast men", because that suited their biblical worldview more.
Another thing that is holding our knowledge back is the idea of these Indo-Europeans. Because you have this focus on the Indo-Europeans, and this is just a tiny part of our heritage. But some people want to interpret everything in the light of the Indo-Europeans. If you go to Europe, they will claim that everything before the arrival of the in Indo-Europeans is irrelevant. And this is a major problem, because yes, we are Indo-Europeans. Many of our forebears were Indo-Europeans. But that's just a part of our heritage.[4]And it's the same part as what we had before. And even though the ancient Egyptians, they weren't Indo-Europeans, they too had the exact same tradition. So whether or not you're Indo-Europeans is kind of irrelevant.
And my point here is that the Neanderthals are our origins. And if you are in the Indo-Europeans branch of the Neanderthals, or if you are a some hunter-gatherer-western branch it doesn't really matter, or if you're a Native American branch. Because they too have Neanderthal ancestors. And their paganism is also based on that exact same foundation. It's kind of irrelevant because it all traces back to the Neanderthals.[5]
And our pre Christian heritage, whether it's in Egypt, or in Persia, or in India, or in Nepal, or in Northern America, or even in China, or indeed in Europe, it's actually the same. And no, that doesn't make it some sort of universe religion, because it is an ancestral cult. And the focus is on the reincarnation of some individuals in the society. And therefore there is an exoteric tradition and an esoteric tradition.[6]And the exoteric tradition, that's what you can read about in the books. That's this, making sacrifices, believing in gods, all that. That's the exoteric part, believing in Santa Claus. The esoteric part is deeper. And it revolves around the concept of reincarnation. Reincarnation of the gods in mankind.
And to understand all of this, you have to look at the Lascaux Cave in the same light as you look at the pyramids and burial mounds in northern Europe. It's all connected. And this is where, of course, the Druids enter the stage. And by Druids, I don't mean the Celtic Druids only. I mean all the priests, so to speak, of all these cultures. And their purpose was to keep the knowledge not only about the esoteric part but also about the names and objects of those who were to reincarnate and such. And we know their role and very well, even from modern days. The Dalai Lama is selected using that method. The Kumari in Nepal is selected using that method. And our forebears, those who were to be reincarnated, they were selected using exact same process, with slight variations from place to place, of course.
And the mythology, is a code. And yes, it is also paganism to keep believing in Santa Claus. You know, If you cannot see what is behind it, you cannot see what is really going on here. That's too is a part of our heritage. So those who keep believing in Santa Claus, they're Pagan too. But reincarnation is the core of our heritage. And it is not for these NPCs who cannot see through their charade. It is for those who have the divine in them. The gods reincarnated.
There are many opinions regarding our pre-Christian European heritage, But is there a right and wrong here? Let's find out.
I believe there's one extremely important thing to consider when we look at not just the sources describing our pre Christian heritage, but also when we look at the people who interpreted these sources. First of all, I'm going to use the Santa Claus example again. As you know, we still have this charade for the children. Where we pretend that there is a Santa Claus that descends through the chimney, and he delivers gifts to the kind children. Those who weren't kind, they get some ashes instead. And this is something we want the children to believe. Therefore, we ask our children not to watch videos like this, for example. And then at the later stage, we either tell the children the truth, or they find out by themselves. And the reason why this picture is important is because if you are not part of this tradition and you come from the outside... I'm surrounded by children, and someone asks me, "what's the purpose of this Santa Claus dude?". Then I will not tell him that this is a charade.[1]I'm going to tell him exactly what I tell the children. And this is also exactly what the written sources, even those from classical antiquity, tell us about our pre-Christian heritage. It tells us what we are supposed to know if we are not "initiated", so to speak. Like adults are initiated into the secrets of Santa Claus.
And I may stress that if you are an outsider, and then, of course, you are going to see only the exoteric version of the religion. And if you write something down, you're only going to write down the exoteric version of the religion or tradition. You're not going to put esoteric secrets in there, because some people can read it, and then the purpose is lost.[2]So whenever someone comes from the outside, interview somebody, or talks to somebody about it, they're going to get the exoteric version. And this is one of the reasons why it's very difficult for us to understand what the esoteric version of our own heritage was really all about.
If you go to archaeology, where you find remains, where you find remains of temples and such, and before the advent of science, educated people, universities and so forth, the people who took the responsibility, if you want to put it that way, in interpreting all of this, were the priests. So, for example, the first remains of our forebears, the Neanderthals, when the priests were shown these remains, they[3]got delivered a version that was very, very at odds with what is actually true. So therefore, you have this presentation of the Neanderthals as some sort of "beast men", because that suited their biblical worldview more.
How these Christian priests presented the proto-Europeans.
How the proto-Europeans probably looked.
Another thing that is holding our knowledge back is the idea of these Indo-Europeans. Because you have this focus on the Indo-Europeans, and this is just a tiny part of our heritage. But some people want to interpret everything in the light of the Indo-Europeans. If you go to Europe, they will claim that everything before the arrival of the in Indo-Europeans is irrelevant. And this is a major problem, because yes, we are Indo-Europeans. Many of our forebears were Indo-Europeans. But that's just a part of our heritage.[4]And it's the same part as what we had before. And even though the ancient Egyptians, they weren't Indo-Europeans, they too had the exact same tradition. So whether or not you're Indo-Europeans is kind of irrelevant.
And my point here is that the Neanderthals are our origins. And if you are in the Indo-Europeans branch of the Neanderthals, or if you are a some hunter-gatherer-western branch it doesn't really matter, or if you're a Native American branch. Because they too have Neanderthal ancestors. And their paganism is also based on that exact same foundation. It's kind of irrelevant because it all traces back to the Neanderthals.[5]
And our pre Christian heritage, whether it's in Egypt, or in Persia, or in India, or in Nepal, or in Northern America, or even in China, or indeed in Europe, it's actually the same. And no, that doesn't make it some sort of universe religion, because it is an ancestral cult. And the focus is on the reincarnation of some individuals in the society. And therefore there is an exoteric tradition and an esoteric tradition.[6]And the exoteric tradition, that's what you can read about in the books. That's this, making sacrifices, believing in gods, all that. That's the exoteric part, believing in Santa Claus. The esoteric part is deeper. And it revolves around the concept of reincarnation. Reincarnation of the gods in mankind.
And to understand all of this, you have to look at the Lascaux Cave in the same light as you look at the pyramids and burial mounds in northern Europe. It's all connected. And this is where, of course, the Druids enter the stage. And by Druids, I don't mean the Celtic Druids only. I mean all the priests, so to speak, of all these cultures. And their purpose was to keep the knowledge not only about the esoteric part but also about the names and objects of those who were to reincarnate and such. And we know their role and very well, even from modern days. The Dalai Lama is selected using that method. The Kumari in Nepal is selected using that method. And our forebears, those who were to be reincarnated, they were selected using exact same process, with slight variations from place to place, of course.
And the mythology, is a code. And yes, it is also paganism to keep believing in Santa Claus. You know, If you cannot see what is behind it, you cannot see what is really going on here. That's too is a part of our heritage. So those who keep believing in Santa Claus, they're Pagan too. But reincarnation is the core of our heritage. And it is not for these NPCs who cannot see through their charade. It is for those who have the divine in them. The gods reincarnated.
- Even if I am NOT surrounded by children. Because HE is an outsider.
- That is for the "druids" to teach some people.
- And these are sources used by modern scholars...
- The "Indo-Europeans" did not bring anything we did not already have here! Just like an American moving back to Europe will bring Santa Claus back
with him, sure, but we already had "Santa Claus" here.
This does not make "Santa Claus" something brought to us from America. - Not Sub-Saharan African Paganism, though. That is a different thing.
- Exoteric for MOST people. Esoteric for the reincarnating Deities/Ancestors.