Video version of this article
0:05:00
A video about the most popular media-topic of our time... 'conveniently' talked more about than our own 'Jim Jones-style collective suicide through multiculturalism'.
Do we have global warming? Yes, we do, but we also have global cooling. You see, the climate is not static, it changes. You have periods when you have very low temperatures, then they go up, you have a shorter period with a warm climate, then it goes down again and so forth. And the cold periods last a lot longer than the warm periods. The cold periods last on average 120.000 years, and the warm periods 12,000 years. So today we are in a warm period and apparently it's still warming up. We are probably at the very top though, so shortly we will see that the climate changes and it starts to get cold again. And what we will get from that is another ice age.
In the Viking age, for example, we had a warmer climate. And if you go further back in time, for example to the Bronze Age, it was much hotter. Even in Scandinavia, women were walking around with tiny tops and short skirts because it was so hot.
You see, the climate changes naturally and there is absolutely no relation between CO2 emissions and global warming. Just like the phases of the Moon, the seasons and night and day. Well, there is one relation. You see, if there is global warming, we have more CO2 emissions and not the other way around. E. g. because CO2 is released from the glaciers when they melt due to the higher temperatures. So our emissions are completely irrelevant in that context. What we do is not influencing the climate one bit. What we influence though, is the environment, and that is a huge problem for us. And to those who think that human CO2 emissions have such a huge impact, let me remind you of the fact that the last big volcano eruption in Iceland had more CO2 emissions than all of Europe has had put together the last 40 years. So one single volcano eruption polluted more or had more emissions than all of Europe the last 40 years or so. And in periods we have many volcano eruptions and in other periods we don't have that many. And they're completely irrelevant in relation to the climate. Except when they are HUGE and clouds of ashes block out all the sunlight in huge areas for years on end. But that is a different thing altogether. So there is no relation between our CO2 emissions and global warming.
So why is the media so eager to talk about global warming and how we should reduce our emissions and so forth? The media, the politicians, and their OWNERS, the banks. And there's a very simple explanation to that. It's a tax scam. They want to take your money and they want to find new ways to make you pay them so that they can waste their money on whatever they want to waste their money on. Global warming theory is a tax scam. Nothing else. There's no science to it whatsoever. PS. It was not like that when I purchased the car new a few years ago (I "only" had to pay 1500 EUROs in CO2 tax).
If you think that you have evidence that proves that CO2 emissions is what's causing global warming, then you are free to put all that evidence in the comment section below. I encourage you to try that because it doesn't exist. There is no such evidence. But again, if you can prove me wrong, please do.
In the Viking age, for example, we had a warmer climate. And if you go further back in time, for example to the Bronze Age, it was much hotter. Even in Scandinavia, women were walking around with tiny tops and short skirts because it was so hot.
The (Danish) Egtved Girl's clothes from the Bronze Age.
Modern illustration, showing how she would have looked.
Modern reconstruction.
Northern and Western European men walked around (during the Bronze- and Iron Age) looking like this.
You see, the climate changes naturally and there is absolutely no relation between CO2 emissions and global warming. Just like the phases of the Moon, the seasons and night and day. Well, there is one relation. You see, if there is global warming, we have more CO2 emissions and not the other way around. E. g. because CO2 is released from the glaciers when they melt due to the higher temperatures. So our emissions are completely irrelevant in that context. What we do is not influencing the climate one bit. What we influence though, is the environment, and that is a huge problem for us. And to those who think that human CO2 emissions have such a huge impact, let me remind you of the fact that the last big volcano eruption in Iceland had more CO2 emissions than all of Europe has had put together the last 40 years. So one single volcano eruption polluted more or had more emissions than all of Europe the last 40 years or so. And in periods we have many volcano eruptions and in other periods we don't have that many. And they're completely irrelevant in relation to the climate. Except when they are HUGE and clouds of ashes block out all the sunlight in huge areas for years on end. But that is a different thing altogether. So there is no relation between our CO2 emissions and global warming.
So why is the media so eager to talk about global warming and how we should reduce our emissions and so forth? The media, the politicians, and their OWNERS, the banks. And there's a very simple explanation to that. It's a tax scam. They want to take your money and they want to find new ways to make you pay them so that they can waste their money on whatever they want to waste their money on. Global warming theory is a tax scam. Nothing else. There's no science to it whatsoever. PS. It was not like that when I purchased the car new a few years ago (I "only" had to pay 1500 EUROs in CO2 tax).
If you think that you have evidence that proves that CO2 emissions is what's causing global warming, then you are free to put all that evidence in the comment section below. I encourage you to try that because it doesn't exist. There is no such evidence. But again, if you can prove me wrong, please do.